by Written on behalf of Wise Health Law October 27, 2017 2 min read

Every year, a number of unregistered practitioners posing as physicians make headlines and cause public outrage and uproar. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) takes such actions seriously and actively polices such individuals to ensure that public safety is protected.

Unregistered Practitioners

An “unregistered practitioner” refers to:
  1. a person who has been practising medicine without a certificate of registration authorizing the person to do so and without being properly delegated to do so by an Ontario-registered doctor; and/or
  2. a person who has been holding him/herself out as a physician in contravention of the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991or the Medicine Act, 1991.
Since 2014, the CPSO has taken action against five individuals who have all posed as doctors, offering services including: psychotherapy, psychiatry, and cosmetic injections. All these individuals purported to offer health-care services, often telling patients that they were physicians, or referring to themselves as “doctor”, while not being registered, or without being properly delegated to provide certain services by a registered doctor. The CPSO maintains a list, publicly available online, where all such individuals are identified. Other information includes details of their infraction, any past discipline against the individual by any other College, actions taken against them, as well as any limits on how they present themselves to the public or about the services they offer.

Actions Taken Against Unregistered Physicians

The CPSO has the power to take a number of steps against unregistered practitioners, including:
  • commencing legal proceedings against non-members, including seeking orders and injunctions;
  • launching provincial-offences prosecutions against non-members;
  • involving the police where there are public safety concerns.
Past court orders that the CPSO has sought have included:
  • orders directing individuals who are not licensed to practice medicine to refrain from performing all “controlled acts” (this includes things like performing diagnostic tests, communicating to a patient about a diagnosis, performing certain procedures, administering some substances);
  • orders directing individuals from using the the title “doctor” or “physician” (or any abbreviation of that title), or purporting to be a specialist in the course of providing or offering to provide health care;
  • a contempt order where an individual who had previously been ordered to refrain from performing controlled acts continued to do so. In that case, the CPSO asked the court to impose a fine, a term of imprisonment, and to order that the individual post signs in her clinic and run ads in the local newspaper notifying the public of the terms of the original order prohibiting her actions.
At Wise Health Law,we are well-known in the legal, regulatory, and healthcare communities. We have extensive experience navigating through the medical, regulatory, and legal worlds and have built strong relationships with key players. We rely on this knowledge and experience to achieve excellent results for our clients. Contact us for forward-thinking and expert advice about health law and regulatory matters. For the convenience of our clients, we have offices in both Toronto and Oakville, Ontario, and are easily accessible. Contact us online, or at 416-915-4234 for a consultation.


Also in Blog

The Interaction between College Proceedings and Limitation Periods

by Rozmin Mediratta April 02, 2020 3 min read

Earlier this year, Wise Health Law succeeded on a motion for summary judgment in a dental malpractice case on the basis that the limitation period had expired before the Statement of Claim was issued. The (unreported) decision was delivered orally on the day of the motion. 

In part, the plaintiff argued that she did not discover her claim until the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario (the “RCDSO” or “College”) rendered its decision, as she did not know if the defendant was negligent when she complained to the RCDSO, but merely had a “suspicion”. 

Ontario Gives Statutory Tribunals Discretion to Conduct Proceedings Electronically Amid COVID-19

by Rozmin Mediratta March 30, 2020 2 min read

In the midst of COVID-19, the proceedings of many health colleges, and consequently of the health professionals they regulate, have been in limbo while everyone finds a way forward. 

On March 25, 2020, the Ontario government enacted the Hearings in Tribunal Proceedings (Temporary Measures) Act, 2020 (the “Act”) to help the process along.

The Act empowers statutory tribunals with more discretion over how proceedings before them are held.

Chiropractors: Considerations in Providing “Emergency Care”

by Valerie Wise March 25, 2020 2 min read

Effective 11:59 p.m. on March 24, 2020, the Ontario government ordered the closure of “non-essential” workplaces.  The list of “essential” workplaces included “health care professionals providing emergency care including dentists, optometrists and physiotherapists”.

The College of Chiropractors of Ontario (“CCO”) interprets this list as including chiropractors, and we agree.

So the question becomes – what is “emergency care”?