by Written on behalf of Wise Health Law August 30, 2018 4 min read

Ottawa Public Health (OPH) has released its report on the Status of Mental Health in Canada’s capital as of 2018. The goal was to produce a local surveillance report on the state of mental health across the population of Ottawa. The methodology used was a population-based model of health. The model was created by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and known as the Positive Mental Health Surveillance Conceptual Framework.

Mental Health and Mental Illness:

An important distinction is made in the report between mental health and mental illness. The report focuses on mental health, not mental illness. Mental health is defined as being the spectrum of emotions, thoughts, and feelings that everyone experiences. Mental illness on the other hand is a diagnosed disorder that affects the way a person thinks, feels, and/or behaves. The two conditions are not mutually exclusive. A person with a mental illness may have good mental health and those without a diagnosed mental illness can have poor mental health.

Why Worry About Mental Health:

The report opines that positive mental health is associated with the following:
  • Better overall health;
  • Resilience to life’s challenges;
  • Reduced suicidal thinking and depression;
  • Substance abuse.
A further concern is that poor mental health can lead to mental illness and addiction. Mental illness in Canada is a significant social problem as:
  • 1 in 5 Canadians are affected by mental illness annually;
  • The burden of mental illness and addictions in Ontario is more than 1.5 times that of all cancers;
  • 23% of Canadian parents care for a child with mental illness;
  • 4,405 suicides were recorded in Canada in 2015
  • The cost of mental health in Canada was estimated at 50 billion in 2011.

Rising Demand for Psychosocial Care:

They report a growing demand across Ontario for mental health and addiction care in both the community and hospital settings. Their numbers for children and youth in Ottawa are as follows:
  • A 25% increase in visits to physicians including family doctors, pediatricians and psychiatrists between 2006 and 2015;
  • A 56% increase in emergency department visits at hospitals especially for anxiety disorders;
  • Increases in return visits to emergency departments;
  • Low follow rates by patients following discharge.

Physicians Bear The Brunt:

Although mental health care is provided from a variety of providers Ontario’s doctors face the brunt of these care needs. Using Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) billing data, the utilization rates for physicians was determined to be as follows:
  • In 2015, 162,496 Ottawa residents made 728,938 outpatient visits to physicians;
    • The largest age group to do so was between the ages of 45 and 64;
    • Visits by those between 15 and 24 rose by more than 10% between 2006 and 2015
  • In 2016, 11,185 Ottawa residents made 17,790 visits to the emergency departments of hospitals for mental health or addiction concerns;
    • This was a 46% increase in visits since 2006;
    • This was the result in more than a doubling of visits by those between the ages of 15 and 24 years.

Clinical Practice Standards:

The result is an ever increasing demand for psychosocial care from physicians. The trend is found throughout Ontario and likely across the country. The CPSO, in its quality assurance and review program, has in effect set standards for these care issues. It asks its assessors to evaluate and rank the practitioner as having been found to have acted appropriately, acted appropriately with some needed recommendations, or to identify concerns as follows:
  • Counselling sessions are (i.e. include the physician’s input and also information regarding the patient’s response and future care plans)…
  • In reference to specific clinical situations, patients are referred to support groups…
  • Recognition and management of family violence or abuse is…
  • Utilization of local social services/agencies in the community is...
  • Patient education materials and resources are available to patients…
  • Psychotherapy sessions (i.e. include documentation of critical interventions, the physician’s input, the patient’s response, future care plans, frequency of sessions, etc.) are…
  • Diagnostic assessments – formulations are…
  • Provisional diagnosis consistent with current DSM or ICD criteria (considering co-morbidities and differential
  • Mental status examinations are…
  • Management of suicidality is…
  • Management of homicidal risk is…
  • Management of doctor-patient relationships (i.e., boundaries, transference, counter-transference, etc.) is…
  • Termination planning is…
  • The use of psychotropic medication(s) is...
Clearly, there is a prevalence of psychosocial problems at the level of primary care in Ontario. An appropriate remedy is critical but is hampered by the resources, time, and skills available. A holistic approach appears necessary. Knowledge of the expected standards of care and the community resources that can provide them is critical to providing an appropriate response. AtWise Health Law, we are passionate about helpinghealth professionals andhealthcare organizations understand and protect their legal rights. We monitor trends and developments in the health sector so that we can provide consistently forward-thinking legal advice and risk management guidance to all of our clients. Our lawyers have significanttrial and appellate experience and will skillfully represent clients whenever litigation is required. Contact usonline, or at416-915-4234 for a consultation.

Also in Blog

Judicial Review: New Time Limits and a Helpful Primer

by Mina Karabit September 17, 2020 4 min read

In December 2019, Ontario’s Attorney General introduced Bill 161, the Smarter and Stronger Justice Act (the “Act”), which became law on July 8, 2020. The Act hopes to simplify a complex and outdated justice system by bringing changes to how legal aid services are delivered, how class actions are handled, and how court processes are administered.

Of note, the Act has amended the Judicial Review Procedures Act (JRPA) to establish new rules as to when an application for judicial review may be brought.

Any decisions made on or after July 8, 2020 are now subject to a 30-day limit for bringing an application for judicial review unless another Act provides otherwise. Courts, however, retain powers to extend the time for making an application for judicial review if satisfied that there are apparent grounds for relief and that no prejudice or hardship will be incurred by the delay. Before these amendments, the JRPA did not set out any time limits for bringing an application, but courts had powers to extend the time to bring an application if another Act prescribed the limit.

Recent Exemptions for Psychedelic Therapy in Canada

by Mina Karabit August 14, 2020 3 min read

In early August 2020, the Federal Minister of Health granted an exemption under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) to four terminally ill Canadians to use psilocybin in their end of life care.

Psilocybin is one of the active ingredients/chemicals in “magic mushrooms,” the other is psilocin. Both psilocybin and psilocin are controlled substances under Schedule III of the CDSA. The sale, possession, production, etc. are prohibited unless authorized for clinical trial or research purposes under Part J of the Food and Drug Regulations. Both have been illegal in Canada since 1974. According to Health Canada, there are no approved therapeutic products containing psilocybin in Canada. However, the purified active ingredient, i.e. psilocybin, is being studied in supervised clinical settings for its potential to treat various conditions such as anxiety and depression.

Health Care Professionals in Ontario Begin the Restart

by Valerie Wise May 28, 2020 3 min read

The Chief Medical Officer of Health for Ontario has issued an updated Directive #2 (dated May 26, 2020) for Regulated Health Professionals in the province. 

Pursuant to the updated Directive #2, all deferred non-essential and elective services by health care providers may be gradually restarted – subject to the rest of the requirements set out in the Directive.

The updated Directive #2 does not provide particularly detailed guidance to health professionals on how to proceed, likely because it applies to such a broad spectrum of health care and health professionals. It does, however, provide some principles to assist health care providers in making decisions as we enter this transitional period.