The Chief Medical Officer of Health for Ontario has issued an updated Directive #2 (dated May 26, 2020) for Regulated Health Professionals in the province.
Pursuant to the updated Directive #2, all deferred non-essential and elective services by health care providers may be gradually restarted – subject to the rest of the requirements set out in the Directive.
The updated Directive #2 does not provide particularly detailed guidance to health professionals on how to proceed, likely because it applies to such a broad spectrum of health care and health professionals. It does, however, provide some principles to assist health care providers in making decisions as we enter this transitional period:
The updated Directive #2 expressly recognizes that health care providers are in the best position to determine which services should continue to be provided remotely and which in person (again, likely because of the breadth and variety of situations involved).
However, that does not mean that health professionals are free to make whatever decisions they want, without restriction or oversight. Decisions must be guided by and comply with the requirements, principles, and expectations of the Directive #2 and the professional’s respective governing College. The updated Directive expressly states that Health Care Providers should be guided by best clinical evidence and must adhere to the guidance of their College.
Before making any decision on how to transition back, health professionals should check the website of their respective College for the most up-to-date statement of expectations or restrictions.
In general terms, the following considerations should also be kept in mind:
NOTE: This blog was written on May 28, 2020, and was current as of that date. A blog post is never a substitute for legal advice specific to your situation, and that is particularly so when circumstances arechanging so rapidly.
In December 2019, Ontario’s Attorney General introduced Bill 161, the Smarter and Stronger Justice Act (the “Act”), which became law on July 8, 2020. The Act hopes to simplify a complex and outdated justice system by bringing changes to how legal aid services are delivered, how class actions are handled, and how court processes are administered.
Of note, the Act has amended the Judicial Review Procedures Act (JRPA) to establish new rules as to when an application for judicial review may be brought.
Any decisions made on or after July 8, 2020 are now subject to a 30-day limit for bringing an application for judicial review unless another Act provides otherwise. Courts, however, retain powers to extend the time for making an application for judicial review if satisfied that there are apparent grounds for relief and that no prejudice or hardship will be incurred by the delay. Before these amendments, the JRPA did not set out any time limits for bringing an application, but courts had powers to extend the time to bring an application if another Act prescribed the limit.